United States Ninth Circuit

Arbitrator, who held that collective bargaining agreement allowed for termination of employee for reasons not stated in the agreement, did not go beyond the boundaries of the agreement by referring to common law, law of the shop and statutes as other reasons for termination.

Appellate Information

• Argued 08/03/2000
• Decided 03/07/2001
• Published 03/07/2001

Judges

• Before:  PREGERSON, HAWKINS, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David A. Rosenfeld and W. Daniel Boone, Van Bourg, Weinberg, Roger & Rosenfeld, Oakland, California, for the petitioner-appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Ernest C. Moore III and Christine S.Y. Chun, Torkildson, Katz, Fonseca, Jaffe, Moore & Hethrington, Honolulu, Hawaii, for the respondent-appellee.