Skip to main content

United States Ninth Circuit


OSENBROCK v. APFEL, 99-35376

Testimony by vocational expert that injured plaintiff lumber mill supervisor could work as a lumber mill timekeeper is sufficient to support an administrative law decision that plaintiff can engage in substantial work.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/02/2001
  • Published 03/02/2001

Judges

  • Before:  ALARCON, FERGUSON and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Denice L. Patrick,Law Office of Denice L. Patrick, Lynnwood, Washington, for the plaintiff-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Renee McFarland, Social Security Administration, Office of General Counsel, Seattle, Washington, for the defendant-appellee.
Copied to clipboard