United States Ninth Circuit
FINK v. GOMEZ, 99-56139
A district court has authority under its inherent power to impose sanctions when an attorney makes reckless misstatements of law and fact, and does so for an improper purpose.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/13/2000
- Decided 02/08/2001
- Published 02/08/2001
Judges
- McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:, Before: CANBY, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Stephen G. Perry, Woodland Hills, California, for appellant David M. Fink.
- For Appellees:
- David T. Dibiase (argued), Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP, Los Angeles, California; Richard R. Clouse and E. Sean Archer, Cihigoyenetche, Grossberg & Clouse, Ontario, California, for appellee Diana Carloni Nourse.