Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


FINK v. GOMEZ, 99-56139

A district court has authority under its inherent power to impose sanctions when an attorney makes reckless misstatements of law and fact, and does so for an improper purpose.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 11/13/2000
  • Decided 02/08/2001
  • Published 02/08/2001

Judges

  • McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:, Before:  CANBY, McKEOWN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Stephen G. Perry, Woodland Hills, California, for appellant David M. Fink.

  • For Appellees:
  • David T. Dibiase (argued), Anderson, McPharlin & Conners LLP, Los Angeles, California;  Richard R. Clouse and E. Sean Archer, Cihigoyenetche, Grossberg & Clouse, Ontario, California, for appellee Diana Carloni Nourse.
Copied to clipboard