United States Ninth Circuit
US v. TAM, 99-10346
Prosecution's suggestion to jury that they select foreperson by secret ballot was not a structural error because the method of selection is a proper one and the trial court properly instructed the jury on how to select a foreperson.
Appellate Information
- Argued 10/30/2000
- Decided 01/24/2001
- Published 01/24/2001
Judges
- BETTY B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:, Before: B. FLETCHER, O'SCANNLAIN, and GOULD, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Suzanne A. Luban, Berkeley, California, for defendant-appellant Lewis Tam., Malcolm S. Segal and James P. Mayo, Segal and Kirby, Sacramento, California, for defendant-appellant Robert Ng., Sandra Gillies, Woodland, California, for defendant-appellant Co Giang., Paul L. Seave, United States Attorney; Richard Bender, Assistant United States Attorney; Michael J. Malacek, Assistant United States Attorney; Sacramento, California, for the plaintiff-appellee.