United States Ninth Circuit
ADAM v. STATE OF HAWAII, 99-15988
Younger absention doctrine does not merit a dismissal of claim with prejudice for money damages under 42 USC 1983, especially where criminal proceedings were no longer pending in state court.
Appellate Information
- Argued 11/14/2000
- Decided 12/20/2000
- Published 12/20/2000
Judges
- TROTT, Circuit Judge:, Before: HUG, TROTT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Ninth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Shawn A. Luiz, Law Office of Michael G.M. Ostendorp, Honolulu, Hawaii, for the plaintiff-appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Steven Christensen, Deputy Corporation Counsel County of Hawaii, Hilo, Hawaii; Edward J. Mulligan, Deputy Attorney General, Honolulu, Hawaii, for the defendants-appellees.