Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Ninth Circuit


ADAM v. STATE OF HAWAII, 99-15988

Younger absention doctrine does not merit a dismissal of claim with prejudice for money damages under 42 USC 1983, especially where criminal proceedings were no longer pending in state court.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 11/14/2000
  • Decided 12/20/2000
  • Published 12/20/2000

Judges

  • TROTT, Circuit Judge:, Before:  HUG, TROTT, and WARDLAW, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Ninth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Shawn A. Luiz, Law Office of Michael G.M. Ostendorp, Honolulu, Hawaii, for the plaintiff-appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Steven Christensen, Deputy Corporation Counsel County of Hawaii, Hilo, Hawaii;  Edward J. Mulligan, Deputy Attorney General, Honolulu, Hawaii, for the defendants-appellees.
Copied to clipboard