United States Eighth Circuit

Defendant's sentence for production of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly relied on the factual statements in the presentence report, and that defendant waived his right to argue factual objections on appeal; 2) the district court did not clearly err in applying the vulnerable victim enhancement; and 3) the district court adequately explained the sentence, and the term imposed was not unreasonable.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/11/2011
• Published 01/11/2011

Judges

• James B. Colloton

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel