Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


US v. Hinkeldey, 09-2841

Defendant's sentence for possession of child pornography is affirmed where defendant's double jeopardy challenge to the separate possession counts must fail, because it was not "clear" or "obvious" under current law that Congress intended that conduct like defendant's make up a single unit of prosecution.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/06/2010
  • Published 12/06/2010

Judges

  • James B. Colloton

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard