Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


US v. Amratiel, 09-3934

Defendant's conviction for possession of an unregistered destructive device is affirmed where: 1) possession of a key is not the sole factor whether a third party has authority over a locked space for Fourth Amendment purposes; and 2) when officers obtain valid third-party consent, they are not also required to seek consent from a defendant, even if detained nearby.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/14/2010
  • Published 10/14/2010

Judges

  • Duane M. Benton

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard