United States Eighth Circuit
Colenburg v. STARCON Int'l, Inc., 09-2544
In an action for race-based employment discrimination, reprisal, and hostile work environment under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff lacked evidence suggesting that defendant's decision to promote plaintiff's white coworker was based upon race; and 2) plaintiff could show no other non-class members that were not fired for doing the same things, and thus his claim was required to fail at the outset.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/31/2010
- Published 08/31/2010
Judges
- Roger L. Wollman
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit