United States Eighth Circuit

In an action pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), alleging that defendant-employer discriminated against plaintiff on the basis of his disabilities and retaliated against him for engaging in protected activity, summary judgment for defendant is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff failed to show that any restrictions resulting from his monocular vision substantially limited his major life activities; and 2) plaintiff failed to present a submissible case that he was "regarded as" disabled.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/27/2010
• Published 08/27/2010

Judges

• James B. Colloton

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel