United States Eighth Circuit

Defendant's conviction for money laundering conspiracy is affirmed where: 1) the indictment was not so defective that defendant could not have reasonably understood the offense for which he was charged; and 2) defendant did not show that the danger of unfair prejudice substantially outweighed the probative value of certain tax information. However, defendant's sentence is vacated where the evidence was sufficient to justify a six-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. section 2S1.1(b)(1).

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/30/2010
• Published 07/30/2010

Judges

• Roger L. Wollman

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel