Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


Copeland v. Locke, 09-2485

In an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendant-police chief used excessive force to effectuate plaintiff's unlawful arrest and that the City of Bella Villa was deliberately indifferent to plaintiff's constitutional rights, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed in part where plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence to create a triable issue of fact as to whether the municipality was deliberately indifferent to the risk that police officers would use excessive force to effectuate an unlawful arrest of citizens. However, the judgment is reversed in part where: 1) if, as plaintiff averred, defendant arrested plaintiff solely for distracting him from a traffic stop through the use of his protected expression, then the arrest was unlawful even if it arguably interfered with police activity; and 2) there was a material question of fact regarding whether plaintiff's injuries were the result of excessive force.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/30/2010
  • Published 07/30/2010

Judges

  • C. Arlen Beam

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard