Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


Cravens v. Smith, 09-1924

In an action raising a claim for indemnification from defendants for a judgment incurred by plaintiff in a separate lawsuit brought by a patient allegedly harmed by the negligence of plaintiff, judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff failed to identify any contractual language specifying that defendants had a duty to defend plaintiff; 2) any decision not to admit evidence of whether defendants were bound by the underlying judgment was harmless, as the record contained other evidence of prejudice; and 3) the district court did not abuse its discretion in striking a venireperson.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/06/2010
  • Published 07/06/2010

Judges

  • Lavenski Smith

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard