United States Eighth Circuit
Cravens v. Smith, 09-1924
In an action raising a claim for indemnification from defendants for a judgment incurred by plaintiff in a separate lawsuit brought by a patient allegedly harmed by the negligence of plaintiff, judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff failed to identify any contractual language specifying that defendants had a duty to defend plaintiff; 2) any decision not to admit evidence of whether defendants were bound by the underlying judgment was harmless, as the record contained other evidence of prejudice; and 3) the district court did not abuse its discretion in striking a venireperson.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/06/2010
- Published 07/06/2010
Judges
- Lavenski Smith
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit