United States Eighth Circuit
Plouffe v. Ligon, 08-3996
In an action seeking to enjoin attorney disciplinary proceedings that defendant initiated against plaintiff, dismissal of the action is affirmed where the district court properly abstained under Younger because: 1) the disciplinary proceedings against plaintiff implicated important state interests; 2) the attorney disciplinary proceedings provided plaintiff an adequate opportunity to raise his constitutional claims; and 3) Arkansas Rule of Professional Conduct 8.4(e) was not "flagrantly and patently" unconstitutional "in whatever manner and against whomever an effort might be made to apply it."
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/02/2010
- Published 06/02/2010
Judges
- GRUENDER, Circuit Judge., Before BYE, COLLOTON and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit