United States Eighth Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

Murray v. Lene, 09-1198

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging, inter alia, an unlawful seizure, dismissal of the complaint is affirmed in part where: 1) the district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's remaining state law claims; 2) plaintiff's conspiracy claim failed because the complaint failed to allege a "meeting of the minds" among the alleged conspirators; and 3) recklessness could be inferred from the omission of information from an affidavit only when the material omitted would have been clearly critical to the finding of probable cause.

Appellate Information

  • Submitted 12/17/2009
  • Decided 02/23/2010
  • Published 02/23/2010

Judges

  • ARNOLD, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel