United States Eighth Circuit
US v. Ingram, 09-2121
Defendant's drug possession conviction and sentence are affirmed where: 1) a pat-down search of defendant was reasonable due to the officer's concern for his safety; 2) defendant was not prejudiced by the district court's preliminary instruction that the jury may hear evidence that defendant had previously been convicted of a prior drug offense; and 3) 18 U.S.C. section 841 did not require that the government prove a defendant was convicted under a particular statutory provision, but only required proof of a prior felony drug offense.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/10/2010
- Published 02/10/2010
Judges
- BRIGHT, Circuit Judge., Before COLLOTON, BRIGHT, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Alan B. Stoler, Omaha, NE, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Shawn S. Wehde, AUSA, Sioux City, IA, for Appellee.