Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Eighth Circuit


Nestle Purina Petcare Co. v. Comm'r. of Int'l. Rev., 09-1381

In the taxpayer's appeal from a tax court's ruling that the taxpayer could not deduct payments for cash distribution redemptive dividends, the order is affirmed where, because 26 U.S.C. section 404(k) did not provide for a deduction-for-dividends-paid under 26 U.S.C. section 561, the taxpayer did not have a "deduction for dividends paid (within the meaning of section 561)" needed to satisfy the exception in 26 U.S.C. section 162(k)(A)(iii).

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/09/2010
  • Published 02/09/2010

Judges

  • BENTON, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, ARNOLD and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Thomas Walsh, argued, St. Louis, MO (Thomas Walsh, Kenneth Allen Kleban and Derek Rose, on the brief), for Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Ellen Page DelSole, IRS Attorney, argued, Washington, DC (Richard Farber and Ellen Page DelSole, on the brief), for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard