United States Eighth Circuit

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action claiming that state officials conspired to raid plaintiff-school's campus and seize scores of its students, denial of defendants' motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity is affirmed where: 1) the district court was not required to provide defendants with an exhaustive written analysis of the merits of each claim as to each defendant; and 2) all of plaintiff's relevant constitutional rights were clearly established at the relevant time.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/08/2010
• Published 02/08/2010

Judges

• RILEY, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, JOHN R. GIBSON, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Christopher J. Quinn, AAG, argued, St. Louis, MO (Diane Peters, AAG, on the brief, Jefferson City, MO), for appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Timothy Belz, argued, St. Louis, MO (Al W. Johnson, on the brief), for appellee.