United States Eighth Circuit
US v. Hamilton, 08-3233
Defendant's child pornography conviction is affirmed where: 1) the officers who performed a warrantless search of defendant's home had reasonable suspicion to do so; and 2) there was no justification for applying the exclusionary rule based on a defect in a later search warrant, because the detective who prepared the warrant merely made a clerical error.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/13/2010
- Published 01/13/2010
Judges
- Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, HANSEN and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Larry R. Froelich, argued, Fayetteville, AR, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Kyra E. Jenner, argued, AUSA, Fort Smith, AR, for Appellee.