United States Eighth Circuit

Denial of petition for writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where the court properly found that plaintiff was not denied access to his attorney in violation of his Sixth Amendment rights, as a state court finding that the limits placed on his phone usage did not unduly interfere with or prejudice his right to counsel was not an unreasonable application of established principles or an unreasonable determination of the facts.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/31/2009
• Published 07/31/2009

Judges

• MILLER, District Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BYE, Circuit Judge, and MILLER, District Judge.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Paul C. Engh, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• James Bennet Early, AAG, argued, St. Paul, MN, Tibor M. Gallo, on the brief, for appellee.