Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


US v. Feemster, 06-2059

Sentence for drug crimes is affirmed where: 1) the district court provided substantial insight into the reasons for its sentencing decision, and thus did not fail to adequately explain its chosen sentence; and 2) the court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant as its justification for imposing the sentence rested on precisely the kind of defendant-specific determinations that are within the special competence of the sentencing courts.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/13/2009
  • Published 07/13/2009

Judges

  • SMITH, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, BEAM, MURPHY, BYE, RILEY, MELLOY, SMITH, COLLOTON, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Daniel Steven Goodman, AUSA, argued, Washington, DC, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Lucille Gardner Liggett, AFPD, argued, St. Louis, MO, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard