United States Eighth Circuit
King v. Astrue, 08-1863
In an action involving social security benefits, district court's order affirming the denial of benefits is reversed and remanded where plaintiff alleged a severe mental impairment as the reason why she could not return to her past relevant work, and thus the ALJ erred in applying the Medical-Vocational Guidelines at Step 5 of the analysis instead of taking testimony from a Vocational Expert.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/28/2009
- Published 04/28/2009
Judges
- BEAM, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, BEAM, Circuit Judge, and KYLE, District Judge.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Timothy C. Harlan, argued, Columbia, MO, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Robert M. Smith, Special AUSA, argued, Kansas City, MO, for appellee.