United States Eighth Circuit

Conviction and sentence for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's Cordy's motion for a continuance of trial to obtain substitute counsel; and 2) district court did not err in applying a five-level enhancement under the sentencing guidelines for possession of 600 or more images of child pornography.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/25/2009
• Published 03/25/2009

Judges

• MURPHY, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• James Martin Davis, argued, Omaha, NE, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Susan T. Lehr, AUSA, argued, Omaha, NE, for appellee.