Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


US v. Ruelas-Mendez, 07-3686

Sentence for illegal re-entry into the United States after a previous deportation is affirmed over defendant's argument that the sentence was substantively unreasonable because the district court failed to give adequate weight to mitigating facts, and gave too much weight to the sentencing guidelines and the need for deterrence.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/09/2009
  • Published 02/09/2009

Judges

  • COLLOTON, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, COLLOTON, Circuit Judge, and PIERSOL, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Katherine Menendez, AFPD, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Frank J. Magill, Jr., AUSA, Minneapolis, MN, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard