United States Eighth Circuit
Ballard v. Heineman, 08-1103
In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action alleging plaintiff was the victim of defendant-state trooper's racially-motivated traffic stop and subsequent unconstitutional search and seizure, which defendants-officials promoted through policies that encouraged the targeting of racial minorities, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff created no genuine issues of material fact challenging unopposed statements of fact showing no constitutional violations occurred as a matter of law; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying further discovery.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/01/2008
- Published 12/01/2008
Judges
- GRUENDER, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, SMITH and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- James Beckmann, argued, Lincoln, NE, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- John Lamoine Jelkin, argued, AAG, Lincoln, NE, for appellee.