United States Eighth Circuit
Anjulo-Lopez v. US, 07-3685
An order dismissing as untimely petitioner's 28 U.S.C. section 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence without holding an evidentiary hearing is affirmed where a duly diligent person in petitioner's circumstances would have discovered counsel's failure to notice an appeal well over a year before he filed his motion, and thus, there was no abuse of discretion in the dismissal of the petition as time-barred without an evidentiary hearing.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/08/2008
- Published 09/08/2008
Judges
- BEAM, Circuit Judge., Before MELLOY, BEAM and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Raymond J. Rigat, Clinton, CT, argued, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Bruce A. Rhoades, Asst. U.S. Atty., Kansas City, MO, argued (John F. Wood, U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.