United States Eighth Circuit
Hinz v. Neuroscience, Inc., 07-2694, 07-2699
In a diversity breach of contract suit wherein a jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs, grant of judgment as a matter of law for defendants on the issue of damages, and rulings denying other requested relief for plaintiff are affirmed where: 1) the district court had jurisdiction to enter an amended judgment reversing the damage award; 2) there was insufficient evidence for the damage award; 3) the district court did not err in instructing the jury on the measure of damages; and 4) it properly denied plaintiffs a permanent injunction, pre- and post-judgment interest, and attorney's fees and costs.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/22/2008
- Published 08/22/2008
Judges
- BENTON, Circuit Judge., Before GRUENDER, BALDOCK, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Aaron Wayne Davis, argued, Eric H. Chadwick, Brian L. Stender, on the brief, Minneapolis, MN, for appellants/cross-appellees., Carl S. Wosmek, argued, Henry M. Helgin, III, Corey J. Ayling, on the brief, Minneapolis, MN, for appellees/cross-appellants.