United States Eighth Circuit

In a prosecution for bank robbery, denial of defendant's motions to suppress two eyewitness identifications and evidence seized as a result of his warrantless arrest is affirmed where: 1) defendant's warrantless arrest had sufficient support, making evidence obtained in a search incident to his arrest admissible; and 2) under the totality of the circumstances, there was very little likelihood of misidentification by bank tellers.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/30/2008
• Published 07/30/2008

Judges

• MELLOY, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, JOHN R. GIBSON and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Katherine M. Menendez, AFPD, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Richard Newberry, AUSA, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for appellee.