United States Eighth Circuit

Reset A A Font size: Print

US v. Jones, 07-2918

In a prosecution for bank robbery, denial of defendant's motions to suppress two eyewitness identifications and evidence seized as a result of his warrantless arrest is affirmed where: 1) defendant's warrantless arrest had sufficient support, making evidence obtained in a search incident to his arrest admissible; and 2) under the totality of the circumstances, there was very little likelihood of misidentification by bank tellers.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/30/2008
  • Published 07/30/2008

Judges

  • MELLOY, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, JOHN R. GIBSON and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Katherine M. Menendez, AFPD, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Richard Newberry, AUSA, argued, Minneapolis, MN, for appellee.