United States Eighth Circuit
Tweedle v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 07-1616
In an appeal challenging a ruling on plaintiff's post-judgment motions after she prevailed on an breach-of-contract claim against an insurer-defendant, judgment is affirmed where the district court: 1) did not err in allowing plaintiff's ex-husband to intervene to protect any claim he might have to insurance proceeds; 2) committed no legal or procedural error in granting insurer-defendant's post-appeal motion to amend the judgment to reflect setoffs; and 3) did not err in denying plaintiff's motion to proceed against the corporate surety.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/04/2008
- Published 06/04/2008
Judges
- BOWMAN, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- David A. Hodges, argued, Little Rock, AR, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Sarah E. Greenwood, argued, Little Rock, AR (John E. Moore, on the brief), for appellee State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., Staci Dumas Carson, argued, Little Rock, AR (James W. Tilley, on the brief), for appellee John Harvey.