Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


Tweedle v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 07-1616

In an appeal challenging a ruling on plaintiff's post-judgment motions after she prevailed on an breach-of-contract claim against an insurer-defendant, judgment is affirmed where the district court: 1) did not err in allowing plaintiff's ex-husband to intervene to protect any claim he might have to insurance proceeds; 2) committed no legal or procedural error in granting insurer-defendant's post-appeal motion to amend the judgment to reflect setoffs; and 3) did not err in denying plaintiff's motion to proceed against the corporate surety.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/04/2008
  • Published 06/04/2008

Judges

  • BOWMAN, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • David A. Hodges, argued, Little Rock, AR, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Sarah E. Greenwood, argued, Little Rock, AR (John E. Moore, on the brief), for appellee State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., Staci Dumas Carson, argued, Little Rock, AR (James W. Tilley, on the brief), for appellee John Harvey.
Copied to clipboard