United States Eighth Circuit

In a putative securities class action alleging that a corporation and certain of its directors and officers had made false and misleading statements concerning the development of a novel computer memory technology, judgment denying plaintiffs' request for another amendment to their complaint and granting a defense motion to dismiss is affirmed where: 1) the district court did not err in finding that plaintiffs' complaint did not satisfy the applicable pleading requirements for securities actions; and 2) plaintiffs did not articulate any proposed changes to their complaint, nor did they show how revision rectify their pleading deficiencies.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/30/2008
• Published 05/30/2008

Judges

• MURPHY, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• William B. Federman, Stuart W. Emmons and Linda H. McGuire, Oklahoma City, OK, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Peter W. Carter, Seth Leventhal, David Y. Trevor, Thomas Jancik and Bradley T. Smith, Minneapolis, MN, for appellees.