United States Eighth Circuit

An order denying defendant's motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 706 to the U.S.S.G. is affirmed where, even with the benefit of Amendment 706, defendant was not entitled to a sentence reduction, as his newly calculated guideline range would still be limited by U.S.S.G section 5G1.1(a) and remain unchanged.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/01/2008
• Published 05/01/2008

Judges

• PER CURIAM., Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Christopher Levell McFadden, pro se.


• For Appellees:
  
• Joe J. Volpe, AUSA, argued, Little Rock, AR, for Appellee.