Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


US v. Cazares, 07-2399

Conviction for conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine is affirmed over claims that: 1) the district court erred by admitting certain testimony as an out-of-court declaration that met the requirements of Fed. Rule of Evid. 801(d)(2)(E) when, in actuality, the testimony was not an out-of-court declaration but the witness's own conclusion based upon the out-of-court declaration; 2) the government failed to show that the out-of-court statements at issue were in furtherance of a conspiracy; and 3) the district court erroneously admitted two out-of-court statements.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 04/10/2008
  • Published 04/10/2008

Judges

  • SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • James J. Regan, argued, Omaha, NE, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • John Hoggins, AUSA, argued, Omaha, NE, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard