Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


US v. Pruneda, 07-2285, 07-2369

Defendants' convictions and sentences for drug- and firearm-related offenses are affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from defendant's house; 2) the sufficiency of the evidence; 3) improper admission of certain exhibits that were unfairly prejudicial; 4) the reasonableness of a sentence; and 5) a refusal to finding that one defendant was a minor participant in the conspiracy.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/08/2008
  • Published 02/08/2008

Judges

  • WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Gregory C. Camman, argued, Seward, NE, for appellant Pruneda., Michael D. Nelson, argued, Omaha, NE, for appellant Garcia-Delacruz.

  • For Appellees:
  • Bruce Gillan, AUSA, Lincoln, NE, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard