United States Eighth Circuit
US v. Pruneda, 07-2285, 07-2369
Defendants' convictions and sentences for drug- and firearm-related offenses are affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized from defendant's house; 2) the sufficiency of the evidence; 3) improper admission of certain exhibits that were unfairly prejudicial; 4) the reasonableness of a sentence; and 5) a refusal to finding that one defendant was a minor participant in the conspiracy.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/08/2008
- Published 02/08/2008
Judges
- WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, WOLLMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Gregory C. Camman, argued, Seward, NE, for appellant Pruneda., Michael D. Nelson, argued, Omaha, NE, for appellant Garcia-Delacruz.
- For Appellees:
- Bruce Gillan, AUSA, Lincoln, NE, for appellee.