United States Eighth Circuit

In a Title VII suit against his employer-corrections department alleging that it retaliated against him for confronting a supervisor about the supervisor's unwanted sexual advances toward a subordinate employee, summary judgment for employer is affirmed where: 1) for purposes of a retaliation claim based on a reassignment, plaintiff's prima facie case was lacking proof of causation; 2) for purposes of a retaliation claim based on his docked pay, plaintiff failed to show that the department's justification for docking his pay was pretextual.

Appellate Information

• Decided 02/07/2008
• Published 02/07/2008

Judges

• SMITH, Circuit Judge., Before RILEY, TASHIMA, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Robert M. Miller, argued, High Ridge, MO, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Dana C. Ceresia, AAG, argued, St. Louis, MO, for Appellee.