Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


Morris v. City of Chillicothe, 06-3995

In a 42 U.S.C. section 1983 action claiming that a police chief, police department, a city, and city council members terminated plaintiff in retaliation for exercising his First Amendment right of freedom of association with an attorney, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed over claims that: 1) there was sufficient circumstantial evidence to show that defendants' firing motive was his retaining an attorney and that the reasons proffered by defendants were pretextual; and 2) the district court's erred in finding that he neither pleaded nor proved a right of access claim.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 01/14/2008
  • Published 01/14/2008

Judges

  • SMITH, Circuit Judge., Before BYE, BOWMAN, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Jeffrey W. Bruce, argued, Belton, MO, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Joseph R. Colantuano, argued, Leawood, KS (Katherine A. Worthington, Katherine I. Tracy, on the brief), for appellees.
Copied to clipboard