United States Eighth Circuit

In an action in contract and quasi-contract for services that an architectural and consulting firm rendered to a school district, a judgment on remand finding that plaintiff was not entitled to recover on the quasi-contract claim is affirmed where the district court did not err in finding that plaintiff was not entitled to recover because the court could not determine with any reasonable certainty what "extra services" it rendered or what their reasonable value was.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/11/2008
• Published 01/11/2008

Judges

• ARNOLD, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, ARNOLD, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Kirk S. Blecha, argued, Omaha, NE (Lindsay Kay Lundholm, Omaha, on the brief), for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Randall H. Stefani, argued, Des Moines, IA (Danielle J. Haindfield, Des Moines, on the brief), for appellee.