United States Eighth Circuit
Harris v. Chand, 06-2315
In an action brought by African-American former employee against ADT Security Services for race discrimination and retaliation in violation of Title VII, judgment pursuant to a jury verdict for defendant is affirmed over claims that the district court erred in: 1) allowing the use of after-acquired evidence; 2) excluding evidence of similarly situated incidents; and 3) restricting the presentation of plaintiff's case.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/13/2007
- Published 11/13/2007
Judges
- BENTON, Circuit Judge., Before MELLOY, SMITH, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Elle JoElle Sullivant, argued, Independence, MO, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Grant D. Petersen, argued, Tampa, FL, Brandon M. Shelton, on the brief, Indianapolis, IN, for appellee.