United States Eighth Circuit

A sentence and restitution order for bank fraud and aggravated identity theft is affirmed in part as to the restitution order as defendant's challenge to it was precluded by his plea agreement. However, the sentence of imprisonment is vacated and remanded as a decision to run certain sentences consecutively did not have an adequate explanation, and thus was unreasonable.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/27/2007
• Published 09/27/2007

Judges

• PER CURIAM., Before WOLLMAN, BRIGHT, and JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Matthew Alan Radefeld, argued, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Philip Eugene Porter, AUSA, argued, Kansas City, MO, for Appellee.