Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Eighth Circuit


Crum v. Vincent, 06-3471

In a suit challenging the state law that allowed plaintiff's medical license to be revoked for failure to pay state income taxes, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) plaintiff received constitutionally adequate notice and had an opportunity for a hearing; 2) the statute was rationally related to a legitimate government interest; 3) the statute was not impermissibly vague; and 4) the state properly revoked plaintiff's medical license for non-payment of taxes according to the law in question.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/27/2007
  • Published 07/27/2007

Judges

  • COLLOTON, Circuit Judge., Before COLLOTON, HANSEN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Diana C. Carter of Jefferson City, Missouri. Also appearing on the brief were Johnny K. Richardson and Jamie J. Cox.

  • For Appellees:
  • Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Mark E. Long, of Jefferson, Missouri. Also appearing on the brief was William S. Vanderpool.
Copied to clipboard