United States Eighth Circuit
Sokol & Assocs., Inc. v. Techsonic Indus., Inc., 06-2379
In a suit involving the breach of a sales representative agreement, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where plaintiff did not present sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the parties' agreement was modified so that its ten-year term applied to the sale of disputed products.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/26/2007
- Published 07/26/2007
Judges
- MELLOY, Circuit Judge., Before RILEY, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Daniel W. Fram of St. Paul, Minnesota. Also appearing on the brief was Andrew P. Muller.
- For Appellees:
- Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Thomas M. Devine of Racine, Wisconsin. Also appearing on the brief was JoAnne M. Breese-Jaeck.