Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Eighth Circuit


Sokol & Assocs., Inc. v. Techsonic Indus., Inc., 06-2379

In a suit involving the breach of a sales representative agreement, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where plaintiff did not present sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the parties' agreement was modified so that its ten-year term applied to the sale of disputed products.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/26/2007
  • Published 07/26/2007

Judges

  • MELLOY, Circuit Judge., Before RILEY, MELLOY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Daniel W. Fram of St. Paul, Minnesota.   Also appearing on the brief was Andrew P. Muller.

  • For Appellees:
  • Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Thomas M. Devine of Racine, Wisconsin.   Also appearing on the brief was JoAnne M. Breese-Jaeck.
Copied to clipboard