United States Eighth Circuit
US v. Singh, 06-2886, 06-3056
Convictions for conspiracy to distribute and distribution of methamphetamine are affirmed where: 1) the district court's admission of hearsay testimony was harmless and not in violation of the Confrontation Clause; and 2) there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions.
Appellate Information
- Decided 07/13/2007
- Published 07/13/2007
Judges
- MELLOY, Circuit Judge., Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant, David Ruiz Sing, in case number 06-2886 was AFPD B. John Burns, Des Moines, Iowa., Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant, Martin Ruiz Sing, in case number 06-3056 was Eric K. Parrish, Des Moines, Iowa.
- For Appellees:
- Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was AUSA Benjamin J. Stansberry, Des Moines, Iowa. Also appearing on the brief was AUSA John Courter, Des Moines, Iowa.