Skip to main content

United States Eighth Circuit


US v. Singh, 06-2886, 06-3056

Convictions for conspiracy to distribute and distribution of methamphetamine are affirmed where: 1) the district court's admission of hearsay testimony was harmless and not in violation of the Confrontation Clause; and 2) there was sufficient evidence to support the convictions.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 07/13/2007
  • Published 07/13/2007

Judges

  • MELLOY, Circuit Judge., Before MELLOY, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant, David Ruiz Sing, in case number 06-2886 was AFPD B. John Burns, Des Moines, Iowa., Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant, Martin Ruiz Sing, in case number 06-3056 was Eric K. Parrish, Des Moines, Iowa.

  • For Appellees:
  • Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was AUSA Benjamin J. Stansberry, Des Moines, Iowa. Also appearing on the brief was AUSA John Courter, Des Moines, Iowa.
Copied to clipboard