United States Eighth Circuit

Denial of a petition for habeas relief from a conviction for robbing a convenience store and a restaurant is affirmed where: 1) state courts' rulings that a photographic array was not impermissibly suggestive were not an unreasonable application of clearly established federal law; and 2) the district court did not err in finding a challenge to cross-examination was procedurally defaulted.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/06/2007
• Published 07/06/2007

Judges

• BYE, Circuit Judge., Before BYE, COLLOTON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Thomas G. Keiderling, Des Moines, IA.


• For Appellees:
  
• Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Robert P. Ewald, AAG, Des Moines, IA.