United States Eighth Circuit
Craftsmen Limousine, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 06-1559
In a suit brought by a limousine building company raising an antitrust claim against Ford and a coachbuilding company, summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where plaintiff failed to produce evidence sufficient to allow a reasonable jury to conclude that it satisfied its burden of proving the unreasonableness of the restraint at issue given "a variety of factors" under the rule of reason.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/19/2007
- Published 06/19/2007
Judges
- MELLOY, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN and MELLOY, Circuit Judges, and NANGLE, District Judge.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Charles L. Richardson of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Also appearing on the brief was E. Diane Hinkle.
- For Appellees:
- Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Kirk A. Peterson of Prarie Village, Kansas. Also appearing on the brief was Kurt D. Williams and Jocelyn A. Villanueva.