United States Eighth Circuit
Lewis v. Jacks, 06-1995
Dismissal of prisoner's federal equal protection and retaliation claims, and state law claims, is affirmed as: 1) telling admittedly noisy inmates to "shut up" on one occasion did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment, even if equally noisy inmates of another race were not equally chastised; 2) a claim of racially discriminatory work assignments failed as plaintiff did not prove they were motivated by race; 3) retaliation claims were properly dismissed because insufficient evidence supported a finding that plaintiff's work assignments would chill an inmate of ordinary firmness from filing grievances, and no evidence of retaliation in relation to a prior grievance existed; and 4) state law claims were properly dismissed on the merits.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/11/2007
- Published 05/11/2007
Judges
- LOKEN, Chief Judge., Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, JOHN R. GIBSON and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Clayborne S. Stone, argued, Little Rock, Arkansas, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Asheton M. Carter, argued, Little Rock, Arkansas, for appellee.