United States Eighth Circuit

In an action claiming that plaintiff's employer, with the intention of interfering with his rights to future pension benefits, forced him to take early retirement in violation of section 510 of ERISA, summary judgment for employer is affirmed as plaintiff failed to introduce facts sufficient to demonstrate an adverse employment action for purposes of his ERISA interference claim.

Appellate Information

• Decided 04/13/2007
• Published 04/13/2007

Judges

• WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Judith K. Schermer, Minneapolis, MN, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• David M. Wilk, St. Paul, MN, for appellee.