United States Eighth Circuit
Synergetics, Inc. v. Hurst, 06-1146
In an action by a company against former employees for breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and related claims, a judgment for the company is affirmed over claims that the district court should have granted defendants': 1) motion in limine to exclude the testimony and reports of company's expert witness; 2) motion for summary judgment or motion for judgment as a matter of law; and 3) proposed judgment and motion for remittitur.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/05/2007
- Published 02/05/2007
Judges
- SHEPHERD, Circuit Judge., Before MELLOY, BENTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Eighth Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Patrick N. Mehan, Sr., argued, Clayton, Mo, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Rudolph A. Telscher, Jr., argued, St. Louis, MO (Matthew L. Cutler, Kara R. Yancey and Douglas R. Wilner, on the brief), for appellee.