United States Eighth Circuit

In an action against a county alleging general violations of procedural due process and a conspiracy to deprive plaintiff of property without procedural due process, judgment for the county is affirmed where a substantive due process argument was improperly raised, and plaintiff failed to establish a deprivation of a property right sufficient to state a due process claim.

Appellate Information

• Decided 01/23/2007
• Published 01/23/2007

Judges

• RILEY, Circuit Judge., Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Karisa D. Johnson, argued, Omaha, NE (K.C. Engdahl, Omaha, on the brief), for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Michael E. Thew, argued, Lincoln, NE., for appellee.