United States Eighth Circuit

A conviction and sentence for mail fraud is affirmed over claims that: 1) the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction; 2) the district court erred in admitting evidence of other wrongs in violation of Fed. R. Evid. 404 (b); 3) the district court erred in allowing testimony about the receipt of "kickbacks"; and 4) the district court erred in rejecting a plea agreement it had previously accepted.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/15/2006
• Published 09/15/2006

Judges

• JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, JOHN R. GIBSON, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• David R. Stickman, argued, Federal Public Defender, Omaha, Nebraska, for appellant., Michael P. Norris, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Omaha, Nebraska (Michael G. Heavican, on the brief), for appellant.