United States Eighth Circuit

In an action under 42 U.S.C. section 1983, claiming that a sign code is unconstitutionally overbroad under the First and Fourteenth Amendments and that plaintiffs' constitutional rights were violated by a city's denial of its billboard applications, summary judgment to the city is affirmed where plaintiff's overbreadth challenge to the sign code failed for lack of standing, and its own rights were not violated.

Appellate Information

• Decided 08/01/2006
• Published 08/01/2006

Judges

• MURPHY, Circuit Judge., Before MURPHY, MELLOY, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• E. Adam Webb, argued, Atlanta, GA, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• John M. Baker, argued, Minneapolis, MN (Robin M. Wolpert, on the brief), for appellee.