United States Eighth Circuit

Summary judgment for defendant-clinic in a breach of contract action is affirmed over claims that the district court erred in: 1) finding no material fact questions existed regarding the clinic's alleged breach of an employment contract; and 2) concluding that extrinsic evidence should not be admitted to aid in interpreting the employment contract.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/31/2006
• Published 07/31/2006

Judges

• BOGUE, District Judge., Before ARNOLD and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges, and BOGUE, District Judge.

Court

• United States Eighth Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Kenneth L. Butters, argued, Des Moines, Iowa, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Jordan B. Hansell, argued, Des Moines, Iowa (Randall D. Armentrout, Des Moines, Iowa, on the brief), for appellee.